Cloud · GCP · Storage
GCP offers a wide range of storage services and tiers, and choosing the wrong one quietly costs money or performance for years. We design storage architecture matched to how your data is actually used — including for analytics workloads.
GCP storage decisions tend to default to whatever was easiest at the time — everything in Standard tier Cloud Storage, regardless of how often it's actually accessed. That default is expensive at scale. Data has a lifecycle: frequently accessed at first, rarely touched later, sometimes needed only for compliance retention. Storage architecture that reflects that lifecycle costs meaningfully less without sacrificing access when it's actually needed.
We design GCP storage architecture — Cloud Storage tiering, BigQuery data architecture, backup and archive strategy — around your real access patterns, not defaults.
Bucket structure, storage class selection (Standard, Nearline, Coldline, Archive), and automated tiering rules
Structuring storage for analytics workloads, playing to GCP's core data strengths
Matching storage class to real access patterns to reduce cost without losing performance where it matters
Cost-appropriate storage for backup, compliance retention, and archival data
Storage configuration for latency- or throughput-sensitive workloads
Only for data that's actually infrequently accessed — tiering decisions are based on real access patterns specifically so frequently used data stays fast and only genuinely cold data moves to lower-cost tiers.
Yes — BigQuery and data architecture design is a common starting point, not just a review of existing setups.
Storage optimization focuses specifically on data architecture and tiering; broader GCP optimization covers compute, database, and other services as well — the two often go together.